Why Customer Discovery is a Waste of Time
A Practical Approach to Testing Your Venture's Problem
In the startup world, the concept of customer discovery is often hailed as a critical step in building a successful venture. Founders are advised to spend countless hours interviewing potential customers, validating assumptions, and refining their value proposition based on feedback. But what if all this effort is largely a waste of time? What if, instead of asking people what they think, you focused on testing their willingness to pay?
The Flaw in Traditional Customer Discovery
Customer discovery often involves asking potential customers about their problems, how they currently solve them, and how a new solution might fit into their lives. However, unless someone is ready to write you a check or shows clear purchase intent, their feedback may be unreliable. People can be polite, enthusiastic, or simply curious, but that doesn’t mean they’ll actually spend money on your product.
The problem with this approach is that it treats feedback as if it were currency when, in fact, the only currency that truly matters is actual currency. Without a financial commitment or serious expression of interest, you can never be certain that your solution is a true painkiller rather than just a vitamin—a nice-to-have but not essential.
A Better Approach: Test the Problem, Not Just the Idea
Instead of relying on traditional customer discovery, test your venture's problem by gauging real purchase intent. Here’s how you can do it:
1. Create a Simple, Cost-Effective Test
Don’t start by building a full-fledged Minimum Viable Product (MVP) that could cost you tens of thousands of dollars. Instead, start small:
Set Up a Simple Website: Use a platform like Squarespace or Wix to quickly create a basic landing page for your product idea. Include a clear value proposition, some light branding, and a call to action.
Offer Pre-Payment Options: Include an option for visitors to pre-order your product, sign up for a waiting list, or even make a small deposit to secure early access. This tests whether people are willing to commit financially to your solution.
2. Use No-Code Tools to Simulate the Product
If you see some purchase intent, the next step is to simulate the product using no-code solutions:
Backend Automation: Use tools like Zapier, Airtable, or Integromat to automate backend processes. These tools allow you to create workflows that mimic what your product will eventually do, giving you the ability to fulfill early customer needs manually.
Manual Processes: At this stage, it's perfectly acceptable to handle parts of the process manually. For example, if your product involves a marketplace, manually match buyers with sellers, or if it’s a service, provide the service yourself or with a small team.
3. Build Traction Before Building a Team
Once you’ve validated that people are willing to pay for your solution, even if it’s not yet fully developed, you’ve proven the existence of a real need. With this traction:
Attract Co-Founders: It’s exponentially easier to find co-founders or early team members when you can demonstrate that the market is interested in your product. Demonstrating traction is a powerful tool in convincing others to join your venture.
4. Secure Funding with Proven Demand
With a core team and demonstrated market interest, you are now in a strong position to seek funding:
Find an Accelerator or VC: Accelerators and venture capitalists are much more likely to invest in a venture with proven demand, even at an early stage. Your ability to show that customers are ready to pay, even for a basic version of your product, is compelling evidence that your startup has potential.
Conclusion: Focus on Real Validation
The traditional approach to customer discovery can often lead to endless questions and ambiguous answers. Instead of spending valuable time seeking non-committal feedback, focus on real validation through purchase intent and pre-payment.
By testing your venture’s problem in the market, you can save time, money, and effort and set yourself up for faster growth and success.
This approach is not only more practical but also aligns your startup with the realities of the market, where the ultimate validation comes from customers who are ready to pay for your solution.
Learn More
Visit us at pegasusangelaccelerator.com
Venture Fellow Program
Designed for aspiring venture capitalists and startup leaders, our Venture Fellow Program offers deep insights into venture operations, fund management, and growth strategies, all guided by seasoned industry experts.
Emerging Angel Program
Break the mold and dive into angel investing with a fresh perspective. Our Emerging Angel Program provides a comprehensive curriculum on innovative investment strategies, unique deal sourcing, and hands-on, real-world experiences, all guided by industry experts.
This is such a theoretical advice. I am certain whoever wrote this has never built a half-sucessful startup.
Such kind of approaches would never work especially in cybersecurity.
Infact I am curious if there is absolutely any example any domain who has actually done the above and successfully built a startup.
I apologise for calling it out, but such kind of articles do more harm then good for aspiring founders, as it oversimplifies building a good product/startup.
This method sounds reasonable, except that if used, we would never have had Youtube, Google, Hotmail, PayPal (who actually paid initial users to use their tool), and countless others. Would love to hear a response from the writer/the team on this?