Founder Mode: Innovation or the Cult of the Founder?
In his blog post, Founder Mode, Paul Graham ignited a wave of conversations about how founders should run their companies as they scale.
A quick message from us at Pegasus:
Pegasus Ascend: Master Sales and Scale Your Startup
Pegasus Ascend is an exclusive 8-week accelerator program designed to teach startups how to sell smarter, scale faster, and achieve lasting growth.
You'll gain actionable strategies to drive measurable success with weekly sessions, one-on-one guidance, and a proven curriculum.
Apply now to join a select group of startups transforming their sales game and building scalable businesses.
In his blog post, Founder Mode, Paul Graham ignited a wave of conversations about how founders should run their companies as they scale. Inspired by a Y Combinator talk from Brian Chesky, the co-founder of Airbnb, Graham proposed two ways to run a company: “founder mode” and “manager mode.” Graham argued that while many founders are encouraged to adopt traditional management practices as their startups grow, this advice can disconnect them from the very details and instincts that drove their early success.
At its core, Founder Mode suggests that founders should stay deeply involved in their companies, even as they scale. It pushes back against the idea that delegation and traditional corporate structures are the only way to grow a business. But this has sparked a debate. Is Founder Mode a vital new framework for scaling startups, or is it simply reinforcing a harmful Cult of the Founder? Let’s dive into both perspectives.
What is Founder Mode?
Founder Mode is about founders staying actively engaged in the details of their company as it scales rather than stepping back and leaving the day-to-day to hired executives. Graham suggests that most advice given to founders is based on how to run a company as a manager, not as a founder. But, he argues, founders have unique insights and instincts that professional managers can’t easily replace.
Graham’s thesis is that founders are not just another layer of management. They are visionaries who bring a unique understanding of their company's product, culture, and vision. Traditional management styles, which encourage delegation and removing oneself from the details, can stifle that original vision.
For Fidji Simo, CEO of Instacart, Founder Mode was about “taking big risks with massive payoffs”—a mentality she says she learned from Mark Zuckerberg during her time at Meta. Similarly, Greg Galant, co-founder of Muckrack, emphasized that there’s often a tension between bringing in experienced leaders with their own playbooks versus maintaining the original vision that made the company successful. The challenge for founders is navigating that tension while staying true to their original mission.
Why Founder Mode Matters
Graham’s argument for Founder Mode touches on the heart of what makes startups unique: the founders themselves. In his essay, he draws on Chesky’s experience at Airbnb. Chesky followed conventional advice to step back and delegate responsibilities as Airbnb scaled, only to find that the company began to drift. Chesky realized that being more involved, especially in product decisions, wasn’t micromanaging—it was necessary to keep the company aligned with its original mission.
In Founder Mode, clarity and attention to detail are essential. Founders must stay engaged to ensure the company remains on the right path. As Siqi Chen, co-founder of Runway Finance, explains, Founder Mode isn’t about micromanaging but about creating clarity: “Micromanagement is what bad leaders do when they are incapable of communicating their intentions with clarity.”
The message is clear: if founders retreat too far, their companies can lose focus and direction. Founder Mode allows founders to maintain that focus, guiding the company through periods of growth while staying connected to the product and the customers.
The Criticism: The Cult of the Founder
While Graham’s Founder Mode has been met with enthusiasm by some, it has also drawn sharp criticism, particularly from those who see it as reinforcing a toxic Cult of the Founder. One of the most pointed critiques comes from Dave Karpf, who argues that Paul Graham’s influence has done more harm than good in Silicon Valley by exalting founders to an unhealthy degree.
Karpf writes that Y Combinator, which Graham founded, perpetuates this Cult of the Founder, elevating founders like Sam Altman, Peter Thiel, and Elon Musk to near-mythical status. According to Karpf, this mindset encourages founders to see themselves as morally superior visionaries who are above the traditional rules of management—and even societal rules.
He contrasts two archetypes that Silicon Valley might value: Sam Altman and Aaron Swartz. Altman, who failed with his startup Loopt but was promoted to President of Y Combinator, represents the founder archetype—driven by ambition, entitled to fail upward, and ultimately rewarded for disruption, even at the expense of ethics. Swartz, on the other hand, represents the hacker archetype—a brilliant and curious mind, someone who built tools for the public good but tragically lost his life after being hounded by the legal system.
Karpf’s critique goes further. He argues that Graham’s essay is not about offering founders constructive advice but rather about glorifying their instincts, even when they might be wrong. He takes issue with the notion that founders, and founders alone, are uniquely capable of understanding their company. In this view, Founder Mode dismisses the contributions of other executives, managers, and employees who help run the company and keep it thriving. Karpf calls out Graham for encouraging founders to ignore the people who may help them scale effectively, labeling them as “professional fakers.”
The Benefits of Founder Mode
Despite the criticism, Founder Mode has real-world advantages for startups navigating the complexities of scaling.
1. Maintaining Vision and Culture: In Founder Mode, the founder stays connected to the company’s mission and culture, ensuring that the original vision doesn’t get diluted by layers of management.
2. Staying Close to Customers: Founders often have an intimate understanding of their customers’ needs. By staying involved, they can react quickly to changes in the market or customer behavior.
3. Clarity Over Control: Founders in Founder Mode don’t necessarily micromanage but create clarity. By communicating the company’s vision and priorities clearly, they can steer the company in the right direction while allowing their teams to execute.
4. Listening to Instincts: Founders develop a “spidey sense” after years of building their company. This instinct helps them identify problems before they escalate. As Rahul Vohra of Superhuman notes, it’s crucial for founders to listen to their gut feelings, even if outside executives push back.
The Dark Side: Risks of Founder Mode
While Founder Mode can help companies maintain focus, there are risks associated with this approach.
1. Founder Blindness: Founders can become too attached to their own vision, dismissing the perspectives of seasoned executives who might offer valuable insights. In doing so, they risk missing opportunities for innovation or growth.
2. Micromanagement Disguised as Clarity: There’s a fine line between staying engaged and micromanaging. Founders who insist on being involved in every decision can stifle their teams and hinder the company’s ability to scale.
3. Cult of Personality: As Karpf points out, elevating founders to near-mythical status can create a toxic work environment, where the founder’s word is treated as gospel and dissent is discouraged.
Conclusion: Navigating Founder Mode
Ultimately, Founder Mode can be a powerful tool for founders who want to stay engaged and ensure their company remains aligned with its original mission. But it’s not without its risks. Founders need to strike a balance between staying involved and allowing their teams to operate autonomously.
As companies grow, leaders should be careful not to fall into the trap of the Cult of the Founder. Successful founders know when to stay engaged and when to delegate. The challenge is finding the right balance—one that allows the company to grow while maintaining its vision and integrity.
Paul Graham’s Founder Mode might not be the perfect model for every company, but it offers an important reminder: founders bring something unique to their companies. But for Founder Mode to succeed, it must be tempered with self-awareness and a willingness to listen to others, lest it become a recipe for isolation and failure.
Learn More
Visit us at pegasusangelaccelerator.com
Venture Fellow Program
Designed for aspiring venture capitalists and startup leaders, our Venture Fellow Program offers deep insights into venture operations, fund management, and growth strategies, all guided by seasoned industry experts.
Emerging Angel Program
Break the mold and dive into angel investing with a fresh perspective. Our Emerging Angel Program provides a comprehensive curriculum on innovative investment strategies, unique deal sourcing, and hands-on, real-world experiences, all guided by industry experts.
Book A Meeting
Connect with Lucas Pols, Founding Partner at Pegasus Angel Accelerator.
the balancing act is key - founders need to keep the passion to inspire and motivate employees, customers, partners, and investors.
🚀